The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.
The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.
The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.
It supported the hypothesis that rationalist epistemology tends into the a great lower standard of engagement with the Engagement subscale plus the constructivist epistemology seems towards a greater level of wedding into Involvement subscale
Hence, epistemology (rationalist compared to. constructivist) is found to be a critical predictor from treatment style. Specifically, one particular powerful conclusions give provisional help into insight you to definitely there are specific variations in the personal form of the therapist with respect to the therapists’ epistemic presumptions. More particularly, the modern investigation unearthed that therapists which have rationalist epistemologies tended toward alot more distance, a reduced degree of engagement, a beneficial narrower appeal, and you can a greater amount of believed within their instructions having website subscribers, whereas, the fresh new constructivist epistemology tended towards with a greater amount of intimacy, a heightened level of wedding, a larger desire, and sense of humor in their cures training. Simultaneously, there’s particular support on the sense you to definitely practitioners that have constructivist epistemologies are likely towards the fresh guidance off autonomy rather than rigidity in the therapy build; yet not it was perhaps not an exceptionally solid wanting in the current analysis.
This type of findings are helpful in terms of new possibly built-in variations was able by the rationalist rather than constructivist epistemologies according to cures build. More especially, current findings contain the understanding you to cognitive-behavioral treatment, and this show an educated depiction of your own rationalist epistemology, take care of an “active-directive” and you will logical approach to therapy (Granvold, 1988) having certain specifications accustomed package the category of your own tutorial (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).
Theory dos-Epistemology Affects new Therapeutic Dating
According to the next hypothesis-practitioners having rationalist epistemologies usually rating highest for the Activity and Mission subscales minimizing on Bond subscale compared to constructivist epistemologies-several other several linear regression design is actually used to choose if the exact same predictor changeable (therapist epistemology) manage determine therapists’ studies of traditional parameters (functioning alliance) considering therapists’ millions of about three subscales-Task, Purpose, and Bond.